Archive for the ‘The Joys of Marriage’ Category

Happy Birthday, Honey! Now I know what it’s like to conduct an affair.

May 20, 2013

Last year, as we got ready to celebrate five years married and ten years together, I decided to throw my husband Lala a surprise party for his 30th birthday.

A big party is consuming enough to plan, but keeping it a secret from a spouse who is the guest of honor? Not only do you have to plan the venue, the theme, the food, the drinks and the guest list without any help from your partner – you have to do it without arousing the slightest suspicion that you’re going out of your mind trying to keep it all under wraps. And perhaps most important, you have to construct the perfect ruse to preserve the shock until your loved one steps in the door.

The whole thing needs more planning and accomplices than a casino heist.

Since our apartment is way too small for a birthday bash, I enlisted my cousins, who live in a large and beautiful row home in South Philly that we all call The Clubhouse.

I invited our mutual friends, but for my husband’s work buddies, I had to approach his boss.

That’s when I realized that this must be a little like having an affair. E-mail and social media accounts that I typically leave open on un-locked laptops at home could blow the whole thing, if my husband happened to borrow my computer for a moment and an errant RSVP popped up.

Is that what it feels like when married people surreptitiously frequent dating sites?

I became more secretive than Don Draper, logging out of everything every time I left the house, and keeping the screen pointed away from my husband when he was at home.

It was exhausting.

And I still had yet to spin the web of lies that would get him to the party unsuspecting.

I realized that the same thing city workaholics use to keep their suburban spouses from discovering an affair would also help me throw a surprise party.

When I told my husband that I had to work downtown all day on the Saturday before his birthday, he didn’t give it a second thought because in real life, that’s what I do anyway.  I said he should meet me downtown because I had a birthday dinner reservation for us.

You see the myriad holes in this plan, don’t you.

But here is where it got good.

My cousin Johanna Austin, who lives in The Clubhouse, is a professional photographer who just happened to be doing some work at the time for a publication I write for.

So I told my husband that one of my editors had happened to match Johanna and me up. And that we would be working on the piece together. At The Clubhouse.

But, you say, how did you know Lala wouldn’t just pull up and call my cell, forcing me to awkwardly wheedle him into the house while I kept friends away from the windows? Seriously, who wants to find street parking in South Philly at 7pm on a Saturday night when you think you’re about to drive to the restaurant, anyway?

Not to mention the fact that my husband knows I’m excellent at using public transportation. Why, he would think, could we not save time, gas, and a possible brawl with the Philadelphia Parking Authority and just meet at home or at the restaurant?

And this is where it got really good.

Before I left that morning to shop and prep the house for the party, I packed my party clothes in my purse without Lala noticing. And then I left a second outfit folded on our bed.

An hour or two before he was supposed to arrive, I called to say I had forgotten my dinner clothes and could he please be sure to bring them to The Clubhouse so while he waited I could get ready without having to go all the way home again.

And like a good husband, he did.

Here’s the video. Note how, because he is illegally parked, he tries to expedite the process by just reaching his arm inside the door with the clothes.  Proof positive that he had NO IDEA!!

The party was great but the lies wore me out. Tonight, we really are going out for dinner.

Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off: The Case Against Weddings.

February 1, 2013
My own wedding reception, in July of 2007.

My own wedding reception, in July of 2007.

I’ve got an idea.

High school and college freshmen should all get a party. The night before their first classes, they should celebrate with a big cake, gifts and gift-cards, toasts and a dance party for all their friends. Their intention to finish their diploma or degree merits a big bash.

And why should anyone have to wait until they’re 65 to enjoy the professional accolades of all their friends and colleagues over a catered dinner and plenty of cocktails? If they intend to give a career their best shot, we should encourage them with a lavish celebration before their first day on the job.

If all that actually sounds foolish to you, then why don’t extravagant weddings seem equally unwise?

I don’t want to minimize the boundless suffering of badly-clad bridesmaids, slighted mothers-in-law, and the aftermath of champagne-induced sexual debaucheries.  But a recent New York Times article examines one of the true plagues engendered by our cultural wedding fetish. It’s called “Married to the Plan. Still Looking for a Possible Groom.” It’s about young American women who have their weddings planned all the way down the napkins – even though they don’t even have a boyfriend.

In a stroke of truly incisive and creative reporting, this NYT piece reveals that there are drawbacks to planning your wedding as if the groom is a last-minute prop stitched into a tux.

“First, what some single women imagine may not be feasible and may actually be a waste of effort,” writer Alyson Krueger explains.  She turns to the owner of a wedding trade show company, who says that brides, for example, might dream of guests sipping pumpkin soup. But then, if they get married in, say, Miami, in, say, February, the chef might announce, “I know you love pumpkin soup, but it’s not in season right now.”

Horrors.

“Another problem [as bad as the soup debacle, d’you think?] is the not-quite-bride is not taking into account a future partner and what his needs and considerations might be.”

The trade-show maven goes on.

“‘Even though you have all these ideas and you’ve done your homework and you are prepared as a single girl,’ she said, ‘you have to understand that marriage is a union and you have to take your other half into consideration.’”

But the single girls obsessed with their as-yet-unscheduled weddings weren’t worried.

As one woman explained, “if she met someone she wanted to marry, she doesn’t think his input would matter.”

Krueger does her homework and quotes a clinical psychologist:

“‘I think for anybody it’s much easier to plan a wedding than it is to form a meaningful relationship that is going to lead to a fulfilling marriage.’”

Stop the world, I want to get off.

Not only are women spending untold hours of their lives planning weddings to non-existent grooms. The New York Times finds it necessary to inform us that this one-sided, superficial obsession does not prepare anyone for a real partnership.

I’d like to shake the hand of whoever came up with that angle. I mean, really, thank God for clear-eyed psychologists.

Image from Postsecret.

Image from Postsecret.

It seems to me that lavish weddings are an irresistible incentive for people who have no business embarking on a lifelong emotional, sexual, reproductive, practical and financial partnership.

Imagine a world of marriages, but no weddings.

We would have been spared the whole Kim Kardashian/Kris Humphries fiasco: without the promise of a televised fairy-tale netting millions, these two probably would have forgotten the meaning of the word “marriage” altogether.

Picture it: no Katy Perry/Russell Brand shambles. The world was a grayer place when we all learned that two elephants on a red carpet at a luxe Indian resort does not a marriage make. No acres of tabloids speculating on the wedding of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, when they already have forty-two children together. No millions of pounds for security measures for the wedding of William and Kate when the rest of Europe is rioting over austerity measures.

True, if we abandoned big weddings, it’s not only the wedding industry that would suffer – advice columnists would see a 75% drop in their mail volume, as all those questions about bridesmaids who dare to get pregnant, guests who demand vegan dinners, and deplorably late thank-you cards would cease to exist.

But if, as the American Psychological Association says, 40-50% of all married couples in the US end up divorced, shouldn’t we consider de-incentivizing marriage itself?

My home church produces a pamphlet about the importance of marriage, and it irks me, because the picture on the cover is of a beautiful young couple in a wedding gown and a tux scampering away together on an idyllic beach.

To avoid giving the wrong impression to those who are selfish enough to believe that their future spouse should have no say in what his own wedding is like, I vote for a different wedding pamphlet image.

I could volunteer the image of my husband and me on the morning we had to get up together before dawn so that we could both go to the insurance-mandated mechanic to hand over our totaled car and sign for a supremely ugly rental before we had to be at work. Or the time my husband got raging tonsillitis while we were on our only vacation of the year. Or the time we bought a couch and then realized it wouldn’t fit in the narrow, angled stairwell to our second-floor apartment.

Sorry, you dewy-eyed lovers, but once the last dance is over, the last congealed canapé is scraped into the caterer’s trash bags, and that new Waterford crystal pitcher is stashed in the closet, that’s marriage.

Did I say I regret it? Of course not. I love my husband and we’ve had many good times. But as the years go by, from coping with grief together to disputes over household chores, marriage can be a mammoth challenge.

And I worry that legions of young people are getting duped into it because of lifelong bridal-gown fantasies.

from Postsecret.

from Postsecret.

I don’t want to you think that my own wedding wasn’t lovely. I argued with my mom about the live goldfish centerpieces, the outdoor July ceremony was wiltingly hot, and I didn’t have time to eat anything during the reception, but it was a wonderful day.

However, it seems that the only thing to match our culture’s divorce rate is our obsession with weddings. At what other time do we lavishly reward people for beginning what is meant to be a difficult lifelong endeavor? (Baby showers, maybe, but giving birth is an even bigger commitment than getting married – you can’t divorce your child and pick a new one.)

The problem with weddings is that they affirm the easiest part of your union (no, that consuming drama over what kind of shrimp you’ll serve or whose estranged aunt should be excluded from the list does not mark the most stressful time of your relationship). You’re young (for the most part – I do realize a greater number of folks are getting married later in life) and you may still be in the giddy infatuation phase of your relationship, when you just can’t get enough of each other. And this – when it all looks so simple and rosy – is when we launch websites to showcase our romance (and disseminate material wish-lists), and spend ourselves into oblivion so all our friends can bear witness to the fantasy.

Maybe we should clear away the sequined gowns, the cummerbunds, the towering cakes with their tasteless marzipan mortar, the lavish gift registries, and the rented parquet, and let marriage stand for what it truly is.

I know many folks from my own family’s church and maybe yours would protest that the beginning of a marriage should be marked with public celebrations, to uphold the value of marriage and help others aspire to it.

But it seems to me that the US at least is already rife with incentives to marry. In fact, countless government benefits bestowed on married couples are a major reason that American gays are still truly second-class citizens in a majority of states.

From taxes, immigration and insurance to inheritance and adoption proceedings, government, social and business policies often favor married couples and their children.

Do we really need fancy weddings, too?

I’m in my late twenties, so of course our fridge is dotted with save-the-date magnets, and I’m happy for my friends. But I’d love to go to a big party for a couple who married modestly and then successfully weathered ten, fifteen, or twenty-five years together. I’d like to toast their love, and, instead of listening to speeches about how much they will mean to each other all their lives (fingers crossed), applaud what the couple has actually achieved and the example they’ve set.

But the reality of marriage is not nearly as sexy and romantic as what we imagine over a new diamond ring. So I fear we’ll continue to wallow in weddings, and hope the rest works out.

Have you been to a wedding (or watched a marriage) that convinced you, one way or the other?

The Silent Airport: Base Camp, Shawarmas, and the Great Passport Freak-Out

January 21, 2013

Our flight from Johannesburg, South Africa to Doha, Qatar took off about an hour late.

“We’re going to miss our connection,” I announced to my husband, Lala, about six times between take-off and the fish and potato dinner.

He tells me every day that I need to stop stressing so much.

I did my best to sleep as we flew over Africa.

About an hour before we landed, the captain apologized to anyone who had a connecting flight in Doha.

I showed a flight attendant our connection’s boarding passes.

“I know it’s out of your control, but can you tell me if there’s any way we could possibly make this flight?”

In my experience, attendants on international flights have a polite and steely reserve born of the long hours and a certain invulnerability that comes with in-flight service. You know and they know that no matter how much of a ruckus you raise, at 30,000 feet, there’s nothing they can do.

“I’m sorry, I have no control over this,” she replied. “I really cannot help you.”

“I understand that and I know you can’t make any guarantees,” I said. “I’m just asking whether, in your experience, Qatar Airways will ever hold a flight for a few moments so customers can make a connection.”

She was about to depart with a final murmured protestation of helplessness, but when the young Turkish gentleman to my husband’s right roused himself and realized that he was about to miss his own flight, she could not ignore all three of us.

She sighed. “If you arrive within an hour of your flight, yes, maybe, they will wait. If it is three, four hours, then no. They will not wait.” She hurried away.

We disembarked into a sunny, blustery, chilly morning on the Persian Gulf and clambered into a pair of large buses which disgorged us at the airport ten minutes later.

Lala and I rushed optimistically to the US departures area – our flight was scheduled for 8:05am, and we had entered the airport at 8:10am.

But the gate was deserted. A staffer shook her head and pointed to a counter, where a silent man took our boarding passes and pecked at a keyboard for about fifteen seconds.

“Eight oh five tomorrow,” he said, handing us a new pair of boarding passes. “Please follow me to the hotel desk.” He took off while we were still spluttering.

There were few things I didn’t know about Doha International Airport.

1)      Qatar Airways is the only airline there.

2)      They seem to have only one departure per city per day.

The speed and dexterity with which the airport delivered us and a large crew of disheveled internationals (including our Turkish pal) to a huge “Booked Hotel Accommodation for Transfer Passengers” desk should have worried us. Apparently, late flights and overnight delays are par for the course in Doha.

A well-oiled machine.

A well-oiled machine.

We were assigned an establishment known as the “Doha Grand Hotel” and given vouchers for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Perhaps I was tired from my flight, but for some reason the problem uppermost in my mind was that I had no deodorant for my upcoming day in Qatar.

Two information desks later and we were on a hotel shuttle.

Old Doha is a tan city. Businesses, offices, stores and hotels are all the same light, earthy shade. But the new Doha skyline, emerging on a small spit of land arching into the Persian Gulf, looks like a gaggle of vertiginous spaceships ready for lift-off. Most of the city is topped by a lattice of construction cranes.

Twenty minutes later, about fifteen of us trailed into the lobby of the Doha Grand Hotel, which was dotted with small leather chairs and smelled of cigarettes. We received a single key on a golden oval keychain, directions to take breakfast on the mezzanine, and notice of our 5:00am shuttle to the airport.

The notable features of our room were a perfectly egg-shaped toilet that sported a hanging nozzle (much like the one in your kitchen for rinsing large pots), an ancient box of a TV, an ashtray, springs poking aggressively beneath the thin mattress’s top, and a heavy smell of bath soap.

Mercifully, the Grand had wifi, so we immediately began to torture ourselves with scathing online reviews of the hotel from others who had been stranded by Qatar Airways.

There is nothing like a long flight to make you ravenous, so we stepped out of our room and wandered to the stairwell, where we met a shorts-wearing Afrikaner moving with unmistakable purpose.

“Breakfast?” he said.

“Yes.”

“Follow me.”

It was an eclectic buffet: pita and paratha, olives, masala, scrambled eggs and French toast, fried onion rings, yogurt and small brown items identified only as “chicken balls.”

The blogger in the Grand dining room.

The blogger in the Grand dining room.

After breakfast, Lala took a nap while I bitterly canceled my Thursday meetings, called our New York taxi service, and Googled Qatar.

Qatar is a chubby little peninsula jutting off of Saudi Arabia into the Persian Gulf. Its currency is the riyal, worth about a third of a dollar, and it’s an emirate currently enjoying a massive boom in oil and gas production as well as US military contracts.

Having argued avidly with my husband for several days about the pronunciation of “Qatar,” I learned that you simply slap a “q” instead of a “g” onto “guitar.”

That afternoon, we turned about 35 dollars into 105 riyals and clambered into the taxi of an Indian man named Simon.  We strolled along the turquoise Gulf on a graceful, palm-lined walkway knows as the Corniche.

High rollers.

High rollers.

Next, we explored the shopping center across the street from the hotel.

We appreciated the unfamiliar fruits and vegetables.

Ten points if you can tell me what the heck this is.

Ten points if you can tell me what the heck this is.

Looking for deodorant, I paused in the cosmetics section.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, white Americans are sun-burning themselves into fatal cancers for the sake of darker skin.

That night, we talked global politics with three beefy Afrikaners who agreed that our host should’ve been known simply as the Doha Hotel.

The next morning, we arrived back at Doha International Airport at about 5:40am. There was a brief but unpleasant scene in security, as the screeners refused to let us pass but didn’t have enough English to explain the problem.

“Cancel! Cancel!” a woman in a burqa kept shrieking. “I have not enough English! Cancel! Cancel!”

Finally, they confiscated a small keepsake of Lala’s: an empty bullet casing made into a keychain that he had saved from a boys’ trip to the shooting range.

We arrived outside security for American destinations by about 6:30am. The sun rose.

A round of recorded announcements played on the PA system in English and Arabic. No smoking outside the designated areas. Unattended baggage will be confiscated by airport security. Doha International Airport is a silent airport.

I wasn’t sure what that last one meant.

At about seven o’clock, a crowd began to shuffle into the US security line and we tried to join them.

No, this was the flight to Washington, DC. The New York flight? someone asked.

Oh, that one is delayed for one hour.

We fell back, and established base camp on the linoleum floor about twenty feet from the US security entrance.

Others bound for New York still clustered hopefully at the entrance. A Qatar Airways staffer stepped in among them and spoke quietly. Lala happened to be passing by on his way back from the restroom, and reported that the airline was offering us a free breakfast in the cafeteria because of the delay.

It sure was lucky at least one of us had been within natural earshot of the information about the delay and breakfast.

Is that what a “silent airport” means?

At about 7:30, our flight disappeared completely from every information board.

I sought solace from the lady guarding the security entrance. “There will be an announcement at eight o’clock,” she said.

“By ‘announcement,’ do you mean you will whisper the information to the four people who happen to be standing right here?” I asked.

“Yes, madam,” she smiled.

I returned to base camp in time to catch a volley of rage at the adjacent counter, for a flight that I believe was going to Vienna.

“That’s what you said yesterday!” an elderly Afrikaner screamed at the man behind the desk, followed by a string of profanities involving a missed flight and insufficient instructions. Someone convinced him to go to the cafeteria and wait for more information there.

“We will tell you, sir,” the staffer insisted.

I decided to have a look at the cafeteria myself, leaving Lala to listen for the eight o’clock announcement, but I was sidetracked as I passed another camp, taking no chances with a position ten feet from the US entrance.

A Mumbai-born American girl sat next to a white American man in a black felt fedora, black scarf, black sweater, shiny black denim pants, and pointy black shoes, orbited by a young Indian gentleman who was showing off his grasp of the English language by cursing with every other sentence.

“…technical difficulties,” Black Hat was saying.

“Do you know something about the New York flight that I don’t?” I interrupted.

“They said it was delayed because of technical difficulties,” he replied.

“But the flight’s not even on the board at all,” I said.

The whole thing was looking more ominous than the walled-off basement of a former funeral parlor.

In the next half hour, two more camps appeared on either side of us. On our left was a middle-aged man and woman with a teenage boy and girl. The girl was wearing pajama pants and Birkenstocks, and the boy was in a sweater that reminded me of my grandfather. They called the adults by their first names, and settled into a hyper-literate trivia game punctuated by a lot of happy laughter.

They had been touring India and Sri Lanka for six weeks. This delay was nothing. One of their trains in India had been delayed twelve hours.

On my left was a young Asian woman who offered to share her international plug converter with us, so we could charge our sputtering iPad.

I would rue her generosity in the hours to come.

Suddenly, the adjacent counter erupted in shouts once more. The Afrikaner was back.

“Then why the hell did you tell me to go over there?” he raged. “I tell you what, I have had nothing but lies and misinformation from you people since yesterday!” This time the swearing lasted a good five minutes.

When he disappeared once again, we were disappointed. While his plight did not bode well for us, he had enlivened the morning considerably and we were grateful.

Eight o’clock came and went. Then nine. The man at the gate stood in imperturbable silence.

A blessed silence.

“I have no information about that flight.”

I noticed Black Hat rise from the masses, and, now accompanied by a lovely young black woman with long dreadlocks, hitch up his luggage and stroll in the direction of the “Oryx Lounge” with a nonchalant finality that I envied intensely.

I wanted to follow, but I worried that I would miss pertinent announcements.

Then, in perhaps the worst development of the morning so far, the US security gate was completely abandoned by all staffers.

“Vienna boarding,” whispered a man at the nearby counter. Fifteen minutes later, he strolled about twenty feet in either direction of the counter.

“Vienna last call,” he murmured at a volume that would delight the strictest librarian. “Vienna last call.”

At about ten o’clock, when I could see a few attendants return to the counters beside the US flights entrance, I stood up and announced a scouting expedition.

“I’ll go with you,” the matriarch of the family on our left announced, leaving a discussion on the exploits of John Winthrop and invasive plants of eastern North America.

We learned that despite the total lack of any information about our flight, boarding was scheduled for 12pm.

I had a vague sense that one day in the future, I might find the ensuing conversation humorous, and I surreptitiously recorded it with my iPod. It went like this:

Alaina: Did you make any kind of announcement that it was changed until now?

Attendant: They feel that it is a silent airport. They don’t make any announcements.

Sri Lanka vacationer: I saw that sign. I just thought that meant people had to be quiet talking.

[Attendant laughs.]

Alaina: What’s the reason for a silent airport?

Attendant: They don’t want any announcements, it seems.

Alaina: So how do you know if your flight is delayed or if there’s a change?

Attendant: They make one announcement, to let the passengers know that it’s a silent airport.

A blaring PA announcement about designated smoking areas and unattended baggage completely drowned out the rest of the conversation.

I asked Lala to hold the fort while I figured out how to make a phone call to our taxi service in New York, delaying our pick-up yet again (Skype calls via our iPad only resulted in an irate receptionist saying “Hello? HELLO?” and slamming down the phone because he could not hear me).

As I passed Black Hat’s former companion, I noticed the Indian man had moved in and was now sharing the girl’s earbuds.

This is what all the public phones looked like.

We're not in Kansas anymore.

We’re not in Kansas anymore.

I tried swiping my credit card to no avail.

I asked a man at the adjacent security desk how to use the phone.

He told me to buy a phone card for 30 riyals (about $10) at one of the upstairs cafeterias.

I spoke to three different cashiers before one told me to I must buy the phone card at the coffee shop downstairs.

I found an escalator and was immediately lost in a bright wasteland of toys and candy.

I found the coffee shop with the help of two different staffers.

The man at the counter told me that I must buy phone cards at the cafeteria upstairs.

“They sent me down to buy from you,” I said.

“Hmm,” he said. Then he told me that they were all out of phone cards, anyway. “Try back at the cafeteria upstairs in half an hour.”

“Well at least you got some exercise,” the man from the unflappable family on our left chuckled when I told the story.

The young woman on our right missed the epic telling completely – she had asked Lala to watch her baggage about an hour ago, and disappeared.

I suddenly realized that if Qatar Airways owed me anything, it was a free phone call to New York. I marched back to the US desk.

Could they give me a phone card? Could they direct me to a phone I could use?

“We cannot help you, madam,” two young women told me.

Being an American who was completely out of patience, I repeated all of my questions at a slightly higher volume.

They changed tactics: “We must wait for the senior,” they cried. Then, they asked me if I had tried the “Transfer Desk”: “it’s opposite Gate 11.”

Just then, a small African man dodged between us, heading for the nearest gate.

“Excuse me sir, where are you going?!” the attendants cried.

“Home!” he said.

“But where is your boarding pass?”

I suddenly remembered a short story by Stephen King that is about a ragged bunch of travelers in a mysterious train station they cannot seem to leave. They gradually realize that they are ghosts.

God, why do I read that stuff?

I walked away and followed a highly inauspicious sign announcing “Gates 9-11.”

I got in line at the Transfer Desk, and after waiting for about ten minutes with absolutely no movement, I began to feel that asking anyone else for help would transcend fruitlessness – surely it would be a kind of absurdity.

I realized that I had had nothing but a few handfuls of trail mix since yesterday. I ducked out of line and returned to camp. On the way, I got intelligence from a Qatari native flying back to his home in the US that our plane would be boarding in 30 minutes.

But God knows what that actually means in Doha.

Just to be safe, Lala and I agreed that we’d take turns at the cafeteria.

As I sat down by our bags with a couple of croissants and Lala departed, I wondered where our neighbor was. We must have looked trustworthy, because she’d left her bags at least ninety minutes ago.

As soon as I lost sight of Lala in the crowd, a man appeared at the US security gate.

“Boarding New York,” he muttered, like a fifth-grade boy who resents his role in the school recital.

But the result was electric – perhaps the hours of silent uncertainty had sharpened our ears. Everyone in a thirty-foot radius moved at once.

Lala had no way of knowing that our flight was boarding.

And what the hell was I going to do with this woman’s bags?

“Don’t worry, that line will take forever,” the family next door said contentedly. Then they celebrated with a plate of shawarmas and fries.

Perhaps after some type of divine warning, our free-spirited neighbor appeared in the crowd about five minutes after Lala did.

Have you ever been white-water rafting?

There might be calm stretches, but you never know what’s around the bend.

Such is US flight security in Doha. My nerves had settled by the time we reached the head of a long line and handed our passports to a security person. She separated us, sending Lala to a separate screening area for men.

And then, the rapids.

Baggage x-ray was staffed by about seven men who moved as if they were loading the last lifeboat of a sinking cruise-liner carrying every president on earth. One took my bag, sneakers, iPad, purse and jacket. Then he yanked my passport and boarding pass out of my hand, threw them into a plastic bucket and shoved it into the machine’s maw.

I stumbled through the metal detector and fell on the emerging buckets, which were flying into the crowd with the help of about four or five men. I snatched my belongings out of the chaos.

My heart fluttered with relief when I saw a US passport clasping a boarding pass. But when I opened it, it wasn’t my name. Another woman snatched it out of my hand. I scrambled among the nearby baskets like a mother grasping for a drowning child.

My passport was gone.

Perhaps it’s important to tell you that I have a bona fide anxiety disorder. I’m mostly free of visible compulsive behaviors, but if I have one, it’s that when traveling internationally, I check for my passport every two minutes.

I had never had an all-out public tantrum before.

Lala appeared at my elbow.

“Ready, babe?”

“My passport is gone,” I gasped.

“What?”

“My passport and my boarding pass are gone. Someone took them and put them in a fucking bucket and now they’re gone.”

“Gone?!”

We searched the buckets – others were grabbing their coats out of my hands as I picked them up to search for my passport underneath.

“My passport is gone!” I shouted at the men working the line. “Excuse me, my passport is gone! It went into the machine, and it didn’t come out!”

No-one replied. None of them even made eye contact. They just kept shoving buckets of stuff at the crowd surging around us.

I approached the woman working the metal detector.

“My passport disappeared,” I shrieked. She looked away, nodded, turned me around with her hands, and pushed me back towards the machine.

“Do you understand what I’m saying? My passport is gone!”

She turned her back and continued directing more people through the metal detector.

I ran back to the men at the machine.

“Excuse me. EXCUSE ME. HEY! Do you understand what I am saying? Hello! MY PASSPORT AND MY BOARDING PASS ARE GONE!”

They gave no sign that they heard me.

Finally, a uniformed man, still refusing to meet my eyes, took my purse out of my hand and began to search through all the pockets. Panic began to drown me as the plastic baskets continued to clatter around us.

I re-searched all of my bags’ pockets again. That’s when I realized that my iPad was also missing.

Suddenly, among the turmoil, I glimpsed a black leather case lying in a security bucket. I flew to it and picked up my iPad.

My passport was hidden under it.

I nearly collapsed. As Lala patted my arm and I put my belongings back together, a burly uniformed man clapped a hand on my shoulder.

“Go now,” he said.

“Thank you, I am,” I answered.

“No. Now. You go now,” he said, pointing at my face. “You. GO.”

What would you guess the purpose was of hustling us through security so fast that we couldn’t even keep track of our own passports?

Apparently, it was to wait for another forty minutes in this line.

See the line around the edge of the room.

See the line around the edge of the room.

Black Hat and his companion were there, but I was not surprised to see that he was too cool to wait with the rest of us – they were watching the line comfortably from the chairs.

Finally, we passed yet another counter (where some kind of badge-flashing marshal was having a serious tête-à-tête with a young man) and traveled a long, slanting passage…into another bus.

“Maybe they are driving us to Dubai,” the elderly gentleman beside me sighed during the packed and rattling fifteen-minute ride across the tarmac.

I shall not pretend to miss you, Doha.

I shall not pretend to miss you, Doha.

Seven or eight hours later, somewhere over Europe, I pulled up the window shade (the flight crew kept us in the dark, like canaries with a towel over our cage) and had absolutely no idea if I was looking at dusk or dawn.

In an hour-long US citizens’ line at passport control in New York, Black Hat was smiling to himself. His pants were a bit more baggy than they’d been in Qatar, but he was otherwise no worse for wear. The family who’d camped next to us in Doha was still laughing out loud. The girl had put socks on under her Birkenstocks.

At baggage claim, Black Hat wrote something down on a scrap of paper, which he handed to the woman with the dreadlocks.

After leaving our family’s Johannesburg home early Tuesday evening, we stumbled into our Philadelphia apartment at midnight on Friday.

“Nothing bad ever happens to writers,” read a Facebook placard I noticed a few months ago. “It’s all material.”

What do you think?

Respect the Husband, Love the Wife: Methods of Ending Marital Strife

December 7, 2012

Because I am a solitary wife this month, with he of the dreadlocks away for awhile in Johannesburg, I thought I’d dedicate this week’s post to the vagaries of marriage – or rather, marriage advice.

A recent Huffpost article titled “It’s the Intimacy, Stupid: 6 Steps for Women to Stamp Out Divorce” cropped up in my Facebook feed last week. In it, marriage help empire-builder Laura Doyle has good tips like adequate self-care, relinquishing controlling tendencies, being vulnerable and practicing gratitude. Unfortunately, she also tills that bizarre ground of so-called “submissive wives” who advocate Bible-based obedience to their 21st-century husbands.

From an earlier post called “How To Stop Your Wife from Having Tantrums at Costco, and Other Christian Marriage Tips.”

“Lack of respect causes more divorces than cheating does because for men, respect is like oxygen. They need it more than sex,” Doyle announces.

This is right in line with “submissive” wives and their pastors who claim that women need love, but men need respect.

Here’s a novel idea. Quit looking at your spouse as another species. Some things I read about man/woman differences make me feel like I’m watching an over-produced Animal Planet special about monkeys of the world.

In my opinion, manuals telling us how to navigate the differences between men and woman have everything to do with what society trains us to think and do, and little to do with the messy work of being humans who share the same duvet.

I think many of my friends are happy  with the view that catering to, or, as my friend put it, “leverag[ing]” gender differences is key to happy marriages.

They posted comments on the Doyle article link like “chances are good that husbands will be better served by ‘I’m proud/impressed at how you dealt with…’ and wives will be better served by ‘you make my world go round.’” Another friend, the author of the worthwhile book Marriage Moats, added that studies have proven 80% of women value love over respect, while 80% of men value respect over love.

For my part, beyond the questionable wisdom of stereotyping people by gender, I wonder what use there could possibly be in separating the practice of love from the practice of respect in a marriage. And how do you quantify such emotional terms into gender-defining statistics? And how do you know that two individuals wouldn’t view the same act, and one call it a gesture of love, and other call it a sign of respect? And even if most men do value respect over love, and most women would do without an equal measure of respect if they could just get some love, does that mean this preference is innate to men and women, or is it a pressure of cultural expectation?

And, as Doyle suggests, can most husbands really shrug off infidelity by thinking “well, at least she’s respectful”?

To me, the dogma that says respect your man but love your woman is just another way to reinforce active roles for men and passive roles for women: men get acclaim for what they do, while women are valued for their lovey-dovey state of being.

Don’t respect your husband because men need respect. Respect him because your husband is a person, and people need respect. Of course the same goes for respecting your wife. Try listening carefully to her opinion or complimenting her work ethic, and see if she doesn’t appreciate it as much as a kiss.

Or deride her expertise and ignore her hard work, and then get her to believe it when you say you love her.

Maybe if my marriage matched the stereotypes, I’d enjoy waving man/woman distinctions like 16th-century peace treaties sealed by royal betrothals.

But between my husband and I, one of us loves shopping and babies and the unrestrained verbal airing of daily events. The other is an emotionally bottled workaholic who can sit for hours in silence and abhors the mall. Guess who is who?

Devotees of Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus would probably guess wrong.

Whatever self-help books and seminar leaders would have you believe, there’s no doctrine, statistic or gender-gap road map that ensures marital bliss, and one marriage should never be used as the metric for another. That might be the kind of secular millennial relativism that makes older generations’ hair stand on end, but with a grand total of five years of married life, and zero New York Times Bestselling relationship books to my name, my advice on marriage is this:

Think about what makes you feel loved and respected as a human being. Then, every day, imagine your spouse as a human being, too.

 

The White Girl’s Guide to African Dreadlocks

November 14, 2012

Let’s spend a little more time getting in each other’s hair.

One night a few weeks ago, my husband and I succumbed to the International House of Pancakes down the road. There were two people in the restaurant waiting area: a young black woman with a pierced nasal septum and dirty pajama pants grooming her black male companion’s luxuriant head of hair.

They weren’t waiting for a table. They were just doing some hair in the IHOP lobby at seven in the evening.

“Why are you guys doing that here?” My husband Lala asked them. They shrugged.

“Nice dreadlocks,” the man said to Lala.

“Thanks man,” Lala replied. From behind him, I pointed to myself. “I did them,” I gloated.

The man’s mouth fell open. “You? No!” he said.

Because a white girl who does a black man’s dreadlocks is way more strange than doing your hair in a suburban restaurant during dinner hours.

But whatever anyone thinks, I’m a very lucky woman. Everyone’s got their “type.” For my mom, it was 90′s-era Ricky Schroder, with his blond hair and blue eyes. But I went the opposite direction.

Ever since I was a teenager, black men with dreadlocks turned my head. It may have started with Harold Perrineau in Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 Romeo and Juliet.  Who needed Leonardo DiCaprio?

“A plague on both your houses!”

Let’s just say that my future husband, a South Africa native, fit the bill. We met when I was barely nineteen and his hair, from the soccer field to the dining hall, was glorious.

My grandmother said it looked like worms were growing out of his head. For years, my mother would gently ask me if Lala had any plans to cut them. Even Lala considered chopping them off occasionally, and shortly after we were married, he actually went a year or so with his hair shaved smooth and close – a sad era for me, but valuable in that I discovered once and for all that I loved my husband with or without the locks.

I find that a lot of white people are a bit mystified by dreadlocks. Many years ago, I, too did not have the slightest idea how anyone got them. The closest I’d come to any dreadlocks-in-progress was in Christian boarding school during my junior year, when a Caucasian classmate down the hall decided she wanted dreadlocks and simply stopped brushing her hair.

As her hair matted into dreadful clumps over the subsequent weeks, school officials noticed and forced her to comb it out, citing a dress-code violation. She was furious. All that not-brushing for nothing.

Some people seem to think that dreadlocks like my husband’s grow naturally, like some people of African descent are born with the style (though, to be fair, we’re all of African descent), or perhaps will their hair to grow that way. “How do you do those?” people ask my husband. Then they are surprised to learn that dreadlocks, like any chosen hairstyle, require meticulous maintenance.

I was surprised when I was pressed into service. Despite having my own head of thick, shiny, naturally golden hair, I was never interested in styling it. The first thing I always tell hairdressers is to do something that I don’t have to mousse, spray, blow-dry or clip. I never learned how to braid my hair or anyone else’s.

But those dreadlocks called my name.

Since so many people seem to be shyly curious about dreadlocks, and I believe my country could do with a little interracial harmony right now, I’m going to tell you the secrets of my husband’s hair, and show you how I take care of it.

The early, gravity-defying phase.

In this photo, Lala’s locks are perhaps a year or two old. I didn’t start them, because my skills aren’t quite there yet. I think it was his younger sister who did the honors. She divided his hair, only about an inch or so long, into dozens of small, roughly square segments, marching in approximately horizontal lines from the nape of his neck to his hairline. She fastened each segment with a tiny rubber band. Then Lala used the crochet-hook method to build his new, short dreadlocks. You take the tiniest crochet-hook head on the market, and pass it quickly back and forth, over and over, through the section of hair. The crochet’s hook tangles the hair so carefully that it becomes a small lock, right in your hand.  It’s time-consuming, but effective when done right.

The next phase, perhaps a year or so after the beach picture above. Even the very top locks are now subject to gravity.

Another year or so later – they’re coming along nicely by our fourth wedding anniversary.

And another year later, this is what the locks look like now.

Once they’ve gotten started, well-groomed dreadlocks need to be twisted every so often. We try to do it every few weeks (occasionally, Lala’s sister does the honors). There are a thousand products you can use for dreadlocks and we’ve tried many over the years, but we prefer natural products. First, Lala soaks his hair briefly in a big bowl of diluted apple cider vinegar and salt. He rinses it, and then washes it first with tea tree shampoo, and then unscented castile soup. The hair, so brown it’s nearly black, is springy and glistening clean at the puffy roots of the locks – the hair that will be incorporated into today’s twists.

Here’s what the dreadlocks look like when they’re ready to be twisted.

We prefer starting with the very back row of hair, and working toward the hairline.

Getting started.

Instead of using a purchased hair product, Lala mixes his own fragrant locking solution of olive oil, jojoba oil, castor oil, sweet almond oil, avocado oil and Vitamin E shaken up with a bit of warm water in a spray bottle. The oils are expensive, but they last a long time and keep the hair in good shape without unwanted scents or residues.

I deal with about three locks at a time, spraying their roots well with the oil solution, and then twisting them so they’re tight enough to keep their twist when they’re dry, but not so tight that they hurt Lala’s scalp.

I shift the hair around freely to reach the section I’m working on.

I used to use metal hair clips to pin the finished locks down, keeping them from untwisting before the hair could dry, which takes several hours without a dryer. But now we use a simpler method where the twists are given a little up-and-over finish, so the root of the lock loops tightly back on itself in a little spiral, like this:

Here’s what the freshly twisted locks should look like.

As I twist, I’m maintaining not only the growing length of the locks, but their tidy shape as well by refreshing the boundaries between each segment of hair.

It’s good to laugh about something along the way.

The locks at the hairline are the trickiest – I have to be extra careful not to pull too hard, and the look of the hair segments in this row should be as tight, clean and even as possible, because they frame the face.

The process used to take me hours. Sometimes we’d have to undo whole sections or even the whole head and start over because my lackluster twists unraveled or didn’t lie in the right direction. But with years of practice, I can now do Lala’s whole head in about thirty minutes.

I’m sure not many husbands wake up on Saturday mornings and say to their wives, “will you do my hair?”

Finished.

Dreadlocks still turn my head wherever I go – but partly because I like to judge if they’re as nice as my husband’s. Sometimes Lala wonders if it’s time to cut them. I say that of course, it’s his head, but please please don’t.

This is certainly not an expert’s guide, or the end-all, be-all in dreadlocks instruction. There’s so much more to learn about the culture, method and styles of this art form, but for those who may have been curious about how this gorgeous hairstyle is created, I hope this has been a fun glimpse.

Do you do something special for your own partner that you never expected you’d learn how to do?

Thoughts on Babysitting Which I May Sorely Regret Making Public

August 30, 2012

Back in the days when I needed a babysitter.

It seems that not everyone who gives birth to a child actually wants to spend all of her time with said child. Thank God for other people’s children, at least the teenaged ones. Need an evening out? Dial up a babysitter.

I began with mother’s helper kind of stuff when I was eleven or twelve, and babysat on a regular basis for several families in my town until I was 17 or so.

Enter a diabolically hyper four-year-old loose in a three-story house. I managed to dress the child in one leg of his red flannel footie jammies before the bedtime ignition. I stalked him up and down the stairs, on and off the beds, trying to stuff in another appendage each time the kid came to earth.

Some of my own babysitters had left strong impressions: stumbling to the couch to nap, feeding my brother and me as much ice cream as we could eat (or, on one memorable occasion, spoonfuls of icy, sticky-sweet orange juice concentrate right from the can), or telling my brother that vampires would come out of the woods to feed on his jugular if he did not go to sleep. I took my responsibilities seriously. I read stories, invented games, engineered blanket forts, went on walks and contrived experiments.

But while I was fond of all my charges, I never loved babysitting: the baths, the bucket full of bullfrog and pond water hitting the clean wood floor, the hurtling, half-jammied bodies. The children at one house, though they denied it, snatched raw cookie dough from the pan with the speed and accuracy of striking vipers. Meanwhile, the family dog had breath which could have been developed as a biological weapon of terror, the full blast of which he released on me after the kids tumbled, complaining of tummy ache, into their beds.

As I rediscovered recently in a Facebook thread from a friend soliciting advice on how much she should pay a local teen to babysit for her little boy, bedtime is an important consideration when calculating babysitters’ pay.

Part of the reason the discussion caught my eye was that though I haven’t babysat anyone for well over a decade, the pay mothers were suggesting last week was quite similar to what I used to get paid.  According to the majority of comments, a 14-year-old girl babysitting a one-year-old for an evening was entitled to $5-$10 an hour.

I put the question out to my own peers – how much had they earned for teenaged jobs? About thirty people replied, describing employment from cleaning to filing to yard work, stable chores, data entry and bagging groceries. Most people reported earning minimum wage up through $10, $12 or $15 an hour for this work. But the babysitters, while a few of them said they made $10 or $12 per hour, generally made do with much less.

A couple twenty-somethings said they had typically made $5 per hour. Another said she had made as little as $2.50 per hour. And another said she was paid $3.50 per hour to babysit four kids, and $3.75 or $4.00 per hour for five kids. But for me, the kicker was that this girl also did office work for $6.00 an hour, and yard work for $8.00.

Why are babysitters paid so little? It’s something that has irked me since I was a teenager myself. People will pay you more to mow their lawn than they’ll pay you to watch their kids.

As my mom so wisely said as we discussed our respective babysitting days, “trying to rationalize pay scales in relation to jobs is really impossible.”

But in the case of your kids’ safety versus the state of your grass, it seems to me that it shouldn’t be that difficult to prioritize. I’m not saying we should pay the yard-work kids less. Rather, let’s pay the babysitter at least as much as we pay the kid mowing the lawn.

But it seems that for the last fifteen years at least, teenage girls (I am assuming that the vast majority of babysitters are girls) are used to accepting $5-$7 per hour, and sometimes less, for what is probably the biggest responsibility the average person of that age will shoulder.

Maybe it’s because I don’t have a natural affinity for children, but babysitting seemed like hard work to me. It was physically tiring, especially when there were multiple kids, and mentally demanding. The responsibility weighed on me: I remember sudden high fevers and at least one epic nosebleed. I got a book on first aid for children and studied it frequently, and took a babysitters’ safety course at the local library. I was certified in CPR.

This is why I’m not on board with the women who suggested to my friend that since her little boy is well-behaved, she could pay a babysitter a lower rate. Again, it’s hard to objectively rationalize pay scales, and yes, some kids are harder to supervise than others, but I don’t like this method of determining the babysitters’ pay.

Even the most seemingly well-behaved kid could throw a tantrum – or unwittingly make a huge mess – once Mom is out the door. But more importantly, whether the kid is an angel or a hellion, the babysitter’s responsibility for the kid’s health and safety is the same. Parents should not justify paying a sitter less because they think their kids are well-behaved. If the child chokes or hits her head or reacts badly to a bee-sting, that sitter’s knowledge and presence of mind could mean life or death. Is that really worth only $5-$10 an hour to modern parents?

Some parents believe that having the sitter there after the kids are in bed should correspond to a lower pay rate.

My advice-seeking friend decided that she could settle on a rate lower than the general $10/ hour consensus (even though she says she thinks that babysitters are generally underpaid) because the sitter “only has him for two hours awake…and then about five hours watching TV.”

A friend backs her up on the lower pay rate: “she’ll be paid for watching TV pretty much.”

Worse, another friend weighs in with a different solution: “I have a friend who pays one rate when the kids are awake and another while they are sleeping.”

Excuse me, but what the hell kind of parental cheapskate thinks that the teenager watching over their children alone late at night deserves a lower rate because the kids are sleeping? Surely any parent knows that sudden illnesses can strike just as easily at night as they can during the day. Not to mention kids who might need comfort after a nightmare or become upset and disoriented to wake up without their parents near.

Do you want your babysitter to feel that her responsibility level is reduced after-hours, just because the kids are sleeping? When I have kids (yep, that’s right, I’ve written this treatise on hiring babysitters when I have no kids of my own), I will certainly hope that my babysitter is just as alert in the evening as she would be during the day, and I’ll pay her accordingly.

And what’s this attitude that assumes teens are looking forward to an evening staying up late alone in your living room? Sure, I remember lots of peaceful nights from my own teen years. I’d get the kids to bed uneventfully and pop in a VHS, read a book, or do homework, checking periodically on the bedroom, until the parents came home.

But there were other times that after-hours babysitting was far from fun.  Sometimes (especially troublesome in the days before cell phones) parents came home much later than they’d said they would and I’d be struggling to stay awake, wishing I was home in bed, while my own parents surely were listening for me to return. On one memorable occasion babysitting at a very isolated house on a totally black night, a sudden loud banging at the back door terrified me (and the dog). Of course everything was locked up. I peered out the doors and windows to see if someone was out there. All I could see was the frosty, silent yard, with the woods on one side and a deep grassy field on the other.

When the parents came home, they said that maybe a skunk had come out of the woods and made the noise.

Sure it did. (To this day I wonder why they settled on a skunk.)

I’m not a fearful person by nature (one day I’ll tell you about my many nights at Eastern State Penitentiary with all the lights turned off). But anyone can get unnerved alone at night in a strange setting. Don’t assume your teenaged sitter is having a great time just because she can sit and watch TV.

So that’s why I’m sad that parents are still willing to pay teens $6, $7 or $8 per hour to take care of the kids, while implying that the job is low-key or easy if the kids are sleeping or well-behaved. Part of me wonders whether we’d have such persistent problems with the disparity between men’s and women’s pay in the US if teenage girls felt as if they could ask for a fair wage for babysitting, while the boy mowing the lawn earns twice as much. Maybe that’s far-fetched, but as I explained in a post earlier this year, I think your work experience as a teenager can have a lasting effect on your career. Who’s to say that the youthful habit of accepting $5 per hour (or less) to care for someone’s kids doesn’t affect a woman’s future ability to demand fair pay on the job?

I wish teen babysitters could be paid at least $15-$20 an hour, as a token of how important their responsibility is.

But I can hear the apoplectic parents now. How could they possibly afford to pay $40, $60 or even $80 just for babysitting every time they go out? I know a lot of families are strapped for cash. But I bet many of them have smart-phones and multiple TVs and two cars and iPads and a premium NetFlix subscription. I doubt many middle-class women balk at occasionally paying $40 or so for a nice blouse or sweater. Isn’t your kids’ wellbeing worth at least as much as a new outfit?

Maybe earning those few dollars for toting someone else’s kids around is an important rite of passage that teaches our teenagers a little hustle. If minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, maybe there’s nothing wrong with paying our babysitters a similar rate.

But it still seems to me that the low pay for babysitters is a legitimate part of a troubling tradition in our country: underpaying our teachers and child-care workers, while hedge fund managers and sports stars and advertisers and politicians are rich beyond most people’s imagining. Our treatment of the people who care for our children is a telling indication of our country’s true priorities.

Even as I write this essay, I’m afraid that I’ll desperately want to eat my words as soon as my husband and I decide to reproduce. A trustworthy teenager willing to watch our tot for a pittance will probably seem like the salvation of our marriage, sanity and bank account all at once.  So maybe I’ll wish I’d never written this, once I can actually relate to what it’s like to try to plan a night out when you have a young family.

But I still hope that when it comes time for me to hand my baby over to a high-schooler, I can pay her a rate that will signify how much I value the work she’s doing, and how important it is that she stay alert.

Parents, what is your experience? Babysitters, does what I say ring true?

THE ULTIMATE CHICK-FIL-A BLOG POST

August 4, 2012

Sarah Palin, a former US governor and current media lightning-rod, joins her husband in showing support for traditional Christian values…by buying a fried chicken sandwich. (No word yet on why she wears her sunglasses inside.)

Fair warning to my readers outside the US: Americans have got their panties in a major twist this month about some chicken sandwiches.

My dad introduced me properly to Chick-fil-A when I visited my parents a few months ago.

He had been rhapsodizing about Chick-fil-A for at least two or three days by the time we stepped up to the counter: the hot, tasty chicken sandwich with fresh lettuce and tomato, the waffle fries, and most of all, the milkshakes.

I doubt he remembers his kids’ high school graduation as well as he remembers his first taste of the Chick-fil-A Banana Pudding Milkshake: according to him, the treat was both arctic cold and yet still easy to sip through a straw. Real bananas swam in vanilla ice cream and met ultimate bliss with ‘Nilla Wafer cookie crumbles that retained their delicious crunch.

But that wasn’t all – Dad also extolled the stellar customer service at Chick-fil-A. Not only would they serve you the best chicken sandwich in the biz, they’d make you feel like a king.

When we went to Chick-fil-A, the girl behind the counter beamed as if she’d been waiting for us all day, and the chicken sandwich and milkshake were everything I heard they’d be.

The next week, I dragged myself to the mall (I needed an outfit for a job interview). Hungry and trembling with the exhausted vexation of a full-figured woman searching for a blazer that fits in the arms and waist as well as the bust, I saw the red Chick-fil-A marquee at the food court.

As I sat down at a table with my sandwich, I realized that it needed a spot of mayo. There was a long line at the counter and I could only see ketchup packs. Just as I decided to do without, an elderly man in a Chick-fil-A apron appeared at my left elbow.

“How are you doing today, miss?” he said. “Are you enjoying your lunch? Do you have everything you need today?”

“Hi,” I said. “Actually, I was hoping for some mayonnaise.”

He smiled with pleasure, reached into his apron pocket, and handed me a pack of mayo.

“You have a great day, now,” he said, before moving onto the Chick-fil-A lunchers at the next table.

I was transfixed for several moments by the shock of being waited upon in the mall food court, where the closest thing to customer service is the cleaning staff sweeping the floor right where your feet are resting.

“He drives Chick-fil-A’s efforts to provide genuine hospitality, ensuring that customers have an exceptional dining experience in a Chick-fil-A restaurant,” the Baptist Press said of Dan Cathy in a July 16th article.

Chick-fil-A’s proud Christian foundation has been a source of moderate controversy for a long time – devotees of their chicken sandwiches have long bemoaned the company’s strict policy of closing on Sundays.

Oh, and there’s the small matter of Cathy’s public preference for the “Biblical definition of the family unit”, reconfirmed in the same Baptist Press piece.

We could dwell on which Biblical family Cathy admires: King Solomon’s extraordinary assemblage of concubines, or perhaps Jacob’s marriage to the sisters Leah and Rachel and his subsequent fecund, wife-approved romps with two handmaidens. Or maybe Cathy would emulate King David, who sent Bathsheba’s husband off to die on the front lines after spying on her during her bath. Or maybe the law about a widow marrying her husband’s brother resonates best.

But what Cathy means, of course, is the Biblical importance of denying equal rights to homosexuals. His recent comments on the Ken Coleman Show claim that advocates of gay marriage are “prideful” and “arrogant”.

“We’re inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage,” he says.

Cathy’s comments about gays aren’t usually so pointed or inflammatory. In the past, he’s claimed that Chick-fil-A doesn’t discriminate against anyone, and that as a fast-food restaurant, they have no public political stance.

But gay-rights advocates in the US are pretty riled because of several million dollars Chick-fil-A has donated to far-right American groups that, depending on your source, advocate the “curing” of homosexuality with special reeducation programs, urge the reinstatement of laws against sodomy, teach that homosexuality is naturally associated with pedophilia, and lobby against the repeal of Ugandan laws that punish homosexuality with death.

There hasn’t been a mass shooting, major US natural disaster, or politician caught in a humiliating affair for about two or three weeks over here. Granted, the Olympics are going on. But that doesn’t provide nearly the angst outlet that we need.

So….Chick-fil-A hates gays! TO THE INTERNET!

The fallout has had more unexpected plotlines than a “Game of Thrones” novel.

Among loud lamentations at how tragic it will be to cut this delicious chicken out of our lives, there’s the Chick-fil-A boycott by my liberal peers, who declare that not another penny of their money will go towards donations to hate groups. There was the “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” counter-wave, in which thousands of good southern Christians lined up around the block for chicken sandwiches to show their support for NOT supporting the gays.

Chick-fil-A noted record-breaking sales.

Meanwhile, the wider fray was already breaking into more factions than the rebels of Syria.

Multiple city politicians announced to the press that Chick-fil-A would be blocked from building restaurants in their jurisdictions because of Cathy’s views. A tsunami of self-appointed pundits-turned-Constitutional-scholars fought back to define the proper roles not of women and men, but of business and the government.

While we all got our Constitutional dander up, guerilla skirmishes on first-amendment free speech flared as Facebook apparently disabled a page supporting Chick-fil-A, and then quickly reinstated it. Free-speech stalwarts pointed out that Cathy is entitled to his point of view, while a flood of suspiciously anecdotal news stories countered that the free-speech dispute is irrelevant because discrimination is in action at Chick-fil-A, from gay employees who feel compelled to stay in the closet at work to a woman who claims she was fired because her Chick-fil-A manager said women should be stay-at-home moms.

Business experts were more interested in coolly debating whether corporate presidents helped or hurt their profits by taking public stances on hot political and religious issues.

Anti-gay Christians rejoiced that so many people are still willing to rally to their agenda, as evidenced by the epic queues at Chick-fil-A locations below the Mason-Dixon Line. Gay-rights advocates rejoiced that the last corporate stronghold of anti-gay sentiment in America was nothing but a chicken-sandwich chain.

Meanwhile, the high-minded hipster gentry got to work pointing out everyone’s terminal hypocrisy, declaring that those waiting in line to support Chick-fil-A would never flood the volunteer lists of a homeless shelter with such zeal, as Jesus would no doubt want them to, while also taking their secular community-garden buds to task for boycotting Chick-fil-A without also boycotting companies like Apple, Amazon or McDonalds for their egregious violation of things like fair working standards. An NPR commentator pointed out that mayors publicly decrying Chick-fil-A for anti-gay bigotry have ignored proven and persistent racial discrimination in their own districts.

Other commentators held forth on bullying, while others devised all sorts of ways to bedevil Chick-fil-A: ordering chicken while dressed in drag or, based on an obscure Bible passage about providing food and water to your guests, demanding free food of Chick-fil-A employees, if they’re so Christian and all. Gay-rights enthusiasts responded to Chick-fil-A appreciation Day by staging a nationwide same-sex kiss-in at Chick-fil-A restaurants.

And in perhaps my favorite development of all, fat-acceptance activists have begun blasting liberals who try to shame habitual Chick-fil-A eaters for being fat: fighting homophobia with fat-ism is just trading one form of bigotry for another!

All we need is a questionable study linking Chick-fil-A to autism in children of gay parents, and we could keep the controversy going until next Wednesday, at least.

One thing I wonder about is our possibly overblown notion of ownership. If I have converted my money into a chicken sandwich, and then enjoyed said sandwich, do I have cause to make any demands on what Chick-fil-A does with what was formerly my money?

While there is something to be said for voting with your dollar, and buying products from socially and environmentally responsible companies, I can’t imagine tracking every dollar I spend, to make sure that the business who’s got it is disposing of it in a way that pleases me. That dollar ain’t mine anymore and its fate isn’t my business – I traded it for a goldfish or a bottle of nail polish or a banana.

If Dan Cathy gives a fraction of his profits to anti-gay groups, am I complicit in that, when really all I did was convert my dollar into waffle fries? As soon as I polish off the fries, I have no claim on that dollar anymore. Why should the occasional cheerfully-served, heavenly Chick-fil-A milkshake dog my conscience?

As I type, I can practically hear the screams of the progressive mob, who would behead my spineless rhetoric faster than Henry VIII would dispatch an unwanted wife.

The truth is, I can think of better ways to support gay rights than NOT eating at Chick-fil-A. But I doubt that I’ll eat Chick-fil-A again, at least in Philadelphia. Despite what my parents think about my working in the “big city”, it’s really a pretty small town around here, especially if you’ve got the network of a journalist. I can hardly step off the train without running into someone in the crowd that I know.

God forbid they see me with a Chick-fil-A bag. They might think I’m a bigot. Or a Christian. Or a bully. Or a Constitutional law enthusiast. Or a gay-marriage opponent. Or a fat person. Or a fat-activist-hater. Or a Republican. Or a free-speech zealot. Or a hungry, weak-willed liberal. Or, worst of all, an ignoramus who doesn’t read blogs at all.

How to Stop Your Wife from Having Tantrums at Costco, and Other Christian Marriage Tips

July 2, 2012

I recently stumbled across a marriage-themed Christian blog that hijacked my thoughts for days. Sometimes, when I go on the internet, I wish there was a TSA for my mind, patting down ideas and limiting the contents of their personal baggage.

So it was that I encountered Peacefulwife’s Blog, with the tagline “The Joy of God’s Design for Wives and Marriage”. I should have cried “to each her own!”, and found some mischievous cat videos instead. But Peacefulwife touched a place in my mind that chitters like the lid of a stainless steel pot when the rice boils over.

What caught my eye was a guest post by Christian marriage writer Daniel Robertson, titled “5 Ways Wives Unwittingly Disrespect Their Husbands”.

My five-year wedding anniversary is coming up this week, and I’m all for learning about ways to improve my marriage. Robertson begins with a true-life anecdote:

“One day my wife and I went shopping at Costco. I began to lead her in one direction fully expecting her to come along with me, but instead she seemed upset and asked me where I was going. Being the boneheaded man that I am, I didn’t tell her, but instead just motioned for her to follow me.”

The Costco trip, far from being a utopia of bathtub-sized ketchup crocks and toothbrush ten-packs, did not turn out well. The wife “stormed off in the other direction” and they did their shopping separately.

“I was floored,” Robertson writes. “Why couldn’t she just follow my lead, I thought. Did I really need to explain to her that I just wanted to grab some bread?”

I already knew the moral of this story. I have lived it countless times in my own marriage, when I kept my mouth shut about what I wanted and then resented my spouse for not being psychic. Surely God and therapists alike are behind the notion of good communication.

But I was wrong.

“The point of the story is that I felt completely disrespected,” Roberston continues. “All I wanted was for my wife to follow my lead through the store and not question what direction I was taking her.”

Uh-oh.

“Ladies, your husband thrives on respect,” Robertson advises. “It is just as important to him as feeling loved is to you.”

Looking through some of Peacefulwife’s own posts, in which she refers to her own spouse as “Respected Husband”, I can see why she invited Robertson to her blog.

A pharmacist, mother of two, stanch Christian and self-confessed former control freak, Peacefulwife now devotes herself to the pursuit of a Bible-based marriage ideal of female submission, and blogs to exhort other women to do the same.

In marriage, she writes, women need love and men need respect. To her (and, presumably, her church-based counselors), this means relinquishing all important decisions to her husband, as God decrees she should.

“If only Eve had known what I am going to tell you!” she begins in a post titled “Let Me Check with My Husband and Get Back with You”.

Peacefulwife has a ready response for any salesperson, neighbor, fellow worshipper, friend or “cult missionary” who asks her for something.

“I need to talk to my husband about that,” she says. Or, “I’ll ask my husband.”

“Imagine if Eve had used one of these phrases when Satan was giving her the offer of a lifetime in the Garden? Wow!”

It’s an interesting take on Original Sin. Instead of disobeying God, Eve just failed to check with Adam.

I want to be fair to Peacefulwife. A reader recently wrote me to say that I lack humility, and that I have a “huge” chip on my shoulder: I hold my opponents in contempt, and my angry tone subverts my message.

So I should clarify that I, too, fully advocate asking your husband. Situations in which I ask my husband include any time a mechanic claims my car needs work, any time someone invites me to do something I really don’t want to do, and any time someone inquires after my husband’s opinions.

Otherwise, my husband and I view decisions as mutual discussions.

“God gave him wisdom that He did not give to me,” Peacefulwife explains of why the husband must be the ultimate household arbiter, and while she does say that her husband values her perspective on his own choices, she is “THANKFUL for God’s wisdom in setting this authority structure into place in our marriage.”

There is something a little seductive about Peacefulwife’s way of life, which leaves all decisions to the husband. It sounds like retirement, or going on vacation without any pets to worry about. I would probably enjoy it for about two days.

But even though I don’t ask for his permission to join a board of directors or change jobs, I do plan to spend a lifetime respecting my spouse. So I read with interest Daniel Robertson’s advice on properly respecting your husband.

Some of his advice really resonates with me. He urges wives not to answer questions that someone else directs at your husband. I think this rule should apply to everyone, not just spouses: don’t speak for other people when it’s their turn to pipe up. Robertson also chides wives who don’t consult their husbands on major decisions, like where to go on vacation or how to spend a tax return.

But given the whole Costco follow-my-lead fiasco, I suspect Robertson doesn’t offer any primers urging husbands not to interrupt their wives, or to consult their wives on important decisions.

His other tips for ensuring wifely respect are even more worrying.

First, he believes that acting like your husband’s “mommy” (setting out his clothes, wiping food off his face, or reminding him to brush his teeth) is “a common mistake that almost every wife makes.” Who knew marriages were crumbling because wives were helping husbands dress or advocating good hygiene?

“Guess what?” Robertson asks. “Your husband didn’t marry you to get a new mommy, he married you to get a partner.”

But according to Robertson’s next piece of advice, a partner is not what your husband really wants at all.

“You tell your husband you want him to lead, but every time he tries you end up questioning him or going against him,” Robertson warns. “He sets his foot down but you find sneaky ways to get around it. He doesn’t want a certain TV show on in his house but you argue about how it’s not so bad and watch it anyway. Let your husband lead already!”

As if to reinforce his ideal wife’s childlike position in the home, his next piece of advice warns wives against “tak[ing] over with the kids”.

“Your husband is trying to discipline or instruct the kids and you just have to step in and take over,” he writes. “There is no need for this. He is perfectly capable of handling them.”

As he is also perfectly capable of handling you, even down to which TV shows you may watch.

I respect every couple’s right to fashion their own lives within the law (or, in the case of homosexual couples in many US states, outside of it). Some couples have an open marriage, some have dogs for ring-bearers, some go to a house of worship every week, some live apart and some never stir a step unless they’re together.

So what really troubles me in Robertson’s case isn’t that his vision of marriage galls me. Rather, it’s that I find his advice on being a good “partner” highly disingenuous. The relationship he advocates (in which one party “sets his foot down” and the other unquestioningly obeys) may be a version of marriage, but it is not a partnership. It is the relationship of an adult and his unruly child.

Even worse is Robertson’s phrase, “All I wanted was for my wife to follow my lead through the store and not question what direction I was taking her.” It’s as if asking a person to silently negate her own needs and questions on a daily basis is a modest and painless request.

Since Robertson had his say, I’ll feel free to throw my own take out there.

Godly or not, the waters of his own marriage are indisputably troubled if his wife “storms off” in public with no more provocation than a simple wordless gesture. Perhaps pent-up misery at her own lack of agency in the marriage has left her with a hair-trigger sensibility that can’t even handle a joint trip to the store.

Why can’t I just leave religious folks to their own sphere?

Because maybe, among Peacefulwife’s devotees, there is a woman who silently grieves at abdicating responsibility, instead of sharing it before her God.

Another Peacefulwife’s Blog guest post by Being June titled “A letter to my newlywed self” exhorts women to memorize and live by this sequence of priorities: “God, husband, children, work, self.” Maybe there’s a wife out there who secretly questions the lesson that she comes last, while her spouse gets a pedestal second only to God. Would God tell you to go to the office every day without breakfast? If you can’t work on an empty stomach, what can a perpetually hungry, marginalized self bring to a marriage?

It’s telling that this sequence does not even allow a woman to put herself above her employment. Why can’t a woman aim for an integrated self that balances many needs (just as she loves multiple children equally well), instead of dissecting the elements of her life into a rigid hierarchy?

I understand what it’s like to absorb that hierarchy. As a child, I assimilated religion-lesson diagrams that illustrated a man’s wisdom versus a woman’s emotional nature, and why this distinguished men as spiritual and practical leaders. I have listened to sermons and read books that urged women to “keep quiet” and leave important decisions to others.

Speaking of traditional religious scholarship, I would suggest that Peacefulwife’s fans think about the Dead Sea Scrolls, which I had the privilege of seeing this week in a Philadelphia exhibit.

It’s highly unlikely that any women were clutching the quill when the Dead Sea Scrolls were written. Hardly anyone knew how to read and write at all, except religious scholars, who were male.

I suppose I could twist this into an argument for Peacefulwife to stay silent, like the traditional wives she claims to emulate. You can’t be a true submissive AND yammer your opinions on the internet to guide other people.  Surely biblical wives did not write down marriage advice and post it in public.

But I have my blog and Peacefulwife is entitled to hers. Write on, sister in online discourse.

Meanwhile, I think that women who tout hearkening back to biblical-era tenets of “submissive” wives should remember that few, if any, of those wives were writing or leading public discourse. But nowadays, Peacefulwife and many of her peers enjoy Christian accolades for launching successful blogs.

If God smiles on the work of Peacefulwife, perhaps a lack of female writers isn’t the only thing about women’s lives that can properly change over time.

Look Out, Advice Columnists. You Never Met My Mother-in-Law.

May 12, 2012

This is a portrait I painted of my mother-in-law last year.

If we were ever to levy a special tax on advice columnists, the money should go to mothers-in-law. According to the advice-seekers, the only thing harder than planning a wedding, making your marriage work or raising kids is keeping your mother-in-law at bay. Flushed with her own success at raising your spouse, there is no aspect of your household immune to her interference.

But if everyone had a mother-in-law like mine, the advice columnists would be out of business.

I actually didn’t meet my mother-in-law, Anita, until a few days before my husband, Lala, proposed. I was the first girlfriend he had ever brought home (not for lack of candidates over the years), and it wasn’t a matter of heading across town or even across the country. I had just made my first-ever transatlantic flight and it was my first time in my husband’s native South Africa. His mom and dad have lived in a house in Soweto, outside Johannesburg, for almost thirty years.

While Lala and his father lifted suitcases out of the trunk, I went in the front door. I had waited four years to see my boyfriend’s childhood home. Anita was waiting in the living room. She hugged me before I could introduce myself.

Some people have trouble figuring out just how to address their in-laws. My husband’s parents have insisted on being “Mama” and “Papa” to me since before I ever walked into their house.

“Ah, my daughter,” Papa says when I sit next to him on the couch. “Thank you, my daughter,” Mama says when I hand her a plate.

Mealtime in her house always accounts for every family member. No-one is required to be home for dinner. But if you’re sleeping in the house, a full plate will be put aside for you, carefully covered, until you get home.

Some mothers-in-law are known for their iron grip on the kitchen. But when I visit South Africa, I get free rein, no questions asked, with my sisters-in-law leaning in to observe the process. My culinary free-for-alls there include but are not limited to spaghetti, pancakes for supper and Thanksgiving dinner, all of which had never been served to the household before.

Not that Mama hasn’t taught me a thing or two. I never learned the best way to separate a chicken drumstick from the thigh until she showed me. She finds me, an American child of an electric dryer, at the clothes-lines behind the house. Cotton and denim that wrinkles and wads in my hands submit to her immediately, hanging like breeze-kissed pennants of cleanliness with a few expert clips of the clothes-pins (or pegs, as they’re called there).

Some mothers-in-law seem to feel that every moment you are not pregnant with their grandchild is wasted. But Mama, herself a mother of six, offers no comment on the issue.  Throughout the years, Papa has kept mostly to one comment.

“One day,” he says, “God will bless you.”

I feel a special bond with Mama because in the Mabaso household, we’re both makoti, the bride. In my husband’s culture, the bride is not a role that finishes on your wedding day – it’s a lifelong mantle of duty and respect. She became makoti when she married Papa in the early seventies. Since Lala has four sisters (three married with their own children) and an unmarried brother, I am the only makoti of my generation in the Mabaso household.

Not that the neighbors are willing to believe it.

One night, while I chatted with Papa in front of the TV, Mama burst out in chuckles.

“My friends asked me, who is that white woman at your house?” she said. Her friends had decided I was a visiting co-worker of Lala’s.

“I told them, it is my daughter,” Mama laughed.

Mama has never failed to treat me like her own daughter, besides taking me firmly in hand in matters of laundry. During my first visit to South Africa, I quickly came down with a nasty cold, probably caught on the long flight. I was up coughing in the middle of the night, and she appeared in the dark with a mug of tea.

Mama has a magic in her fingers that not even her grown daughters can match. Look at the head-wrap I am wearing in this photo with Lala’s sister Nthabiseng. She arranged it with a few bobby pins in a matter of seconds. I wish I could wear it every week.

This is from a wedding in Soweto last year. Female guests often put on traditional African garb to celebrate. Since we’re both Tsonga brides, I had the honor of wearing Mama’s own wedding outfit. (Ntabiseng married a Zulu man, so her outfit is different. Our new nephew’s birth is weeks away).

Mama and Papa have stories that should never be lost. Lala was born in 1982, a time when violence and mass protests against South Africa’s apartheid regime roiled the black townships surrounding Johannesburg. Afrikaner tanks patrolled the neighborhood where my husband walked to preschool.

In the 70’s, Mama and Papa had harrowing experiences typical of a generation of black South Africans.

Mama and Papa, around the time they got married.

Every black citizen who wanted to move beyond their designated township was required to carry a passbook, known as a dom pas, that authorized his or her presence in the area. In Afrikaans, according to my husband, dom means “dumb” or “fool”.  Blacks had to obtain special living permits, and their movements outside their own neighborhoods, into areas reserved for whites, were determined by their employers, whose dom pas stamps authorized workers’ presence in the company’s city. Anyone white could ask for it at any time. If you didn’t have it, you were arrested.

Now, the musty dom pas books are stashed in drawers like old tax forms (Mama and Papa never throw anything away).

Before the late eighties, if the city you were in didn’t match the city stamp on your dom pas, you were arrested. All employees were required to get a monthly signature in the dom pas from their employers. If the signature was missing, you were arrested. If the signature was made in the wrong page, you were arrested. If the signature was not made before seventh of the month, you were arrested.

Mama and Papa had plenty of experience with employer’s stamps. Papa, now retired, worked several jobs over the years, often as a welder, and Mama was a seamstress until her retirement last year. Mama’s name is misspelled in her book. This was very common. There was no point in trying to get it fixed. It was just one more reminder of what a second-class citizen you were.

“Permitted to remain in the prescribed area….” A page from the dom pas Mama had in the 70′s and 80′s.

Papa was arrested in Germiston in 1976: his employer had suddenly moved operations there from Johannesburg without issuing him a new dom pas. He was stopped and taken right off the street, but released with a warning when his employer vouched for his presence in the city.

Another of Papa’s arrests had to have been as harrowing for Mama as it was for him.

In 1975, with the three children they had at the time staying with relatives, Mama and Papa took the risk of renting a room in Pimville without getting a permit to live there.

These permits cost R2.50 per year, Papa explained. At the time, that was more than many black families could afford. Today, one US dollar is worth approximately seven rands. In the mid-1980s, Papa made R140 per week working Monday through Saturday.

One morning at 4am, they woke up to pounding at the door. Mama dashed to the wardrobe and hid herself inside. When Papa opened the door, police officers interrogated him.

“Where’s your permit?” they demanded. He had none.

“Where is your wife?” He said he didn’t know where she was. Papa was determined to go calmly and gave no sign that anyone else was hiding there. The wardrobe wasn’t searched. He was forced into the police car and taken to jail.

“What did you do?” I asked Mama breathlessly.

“I went to work,” she said. She hid until everything was quiet, and the next morning, she had no choice but to head to work as usual. Phones were scarce. If she went to the police to ask where Papa was, she would have been immediately arrested as well. She couldn’t ask any neighbors – she knew that someone in the neighborhood had reported them to the police, but had no way of knowing who.

Papa spent the rest of the night and the next day in jail. R10 was the usual fee for bail.

“At that time, ten rands was scarce,” he said.

All Mama could do was wonder and wait. Papa returned that evening, unharmed. He had been questioned, and then the judge shocked him by releasing him, with strict orders not to tell any of his neighbors how leniently he had been treated.

I asked Papa if would have predicted the end of Apartheid. At the time, “I didn’t think it would ever be different,” he said.

I asked Mama what it was like, trying to raise her family at that time.  I expected something profound on keeping a family intact under terrible oppression. She surprised me by side-stepping the question.

She explained that Papa’s family wanted them to take the children and move back to the rural eastern province, near today’s Kruger Park, where she and Papa grew up. But she wanted to stay in Johannesburg so that she could keep working, not leave for a quiet, traditional life the countryside.

“I didn’t want to sit in Bushbuck Ridge,” she said.

Mama lived through terrifying times, but her concerns were the same as any working woman. Despite the incredible gulf between our experiences, we are not such different women, after all.

Happy Mother’s Day, Mama!

Mama and I outside Lala’s childhood home in Soweto. (We both like purple.)

Did I Ever Tell You About My Super-Power?

April 20, 2012

Since this is a post about my super-power, I figured I'd be a better version of myself, for once.

I’m not kidding: I have a super-human power that most people can only read comic books about. I wasn’t bitten by an enhanced arachnid, doused in radioactive goo, or hurled to Earth from an alien planet (or supernatural Nordic palace of the gods). I’m not on the frontier of human genetic mutation, and nor do I have enough money to turn myself into an invincible high-tech inner-city vigilante. Zeus didn’t seduce my mother and I’m not a goddess by the measure of any modern faith (I knew you were wondering).

But I do owe my power to my parents.

Are you ready? Here it is.

I can make myself invisible.

How long have human beings fantasized about the unlimited espionage potential of being invisible? Harry Potter’s Invisibility Cloak is arguably his coolest accessory, allowing for all sorts of outlandish schemes even most wizards wouldn’t attempt.

But as any reputable psychic might also tell you, my gift is fickle. It comes and goes without warning, and I can never predict when it’s going to happen. I can’t time my invisibility to learn the things that would be of most interest to everyone.

How did I come by my gift? It’s as simple as my name, and that’s why I owe it all to my parents – and the advent of cell phones.

For a long time, I just thought all the pocket-dials were irritating. Sometimes, it’s up to two or three in one day – my husband, my parents, friends and colleagues regularly dial my number at all hours without realizing it. That’s because the spelling of my name puts it at the top of the contact list of most of my acquaintances’ cell phones. When they slip it into their pocket or purse without properly locking the screen or buttons, it dials the first person on the list. Me.

Don’t you see what this means? At any given moment of the day, I can be given complete, real-time, blameless auditory access to whatever you’re doing or saying for as long as I let the call continue, no expensive hidden microphones or sneaking around required. Is there anything closer to being invisible?

But while Harry Potter used his Invisibility Cloak for shocking revelations about the goings-on at Hogwarts and Hogsmeade, I have found that real-life invisibility is far less interesting.

I just get random snippets of coffee-shop conversation or boring work chit-chat. There was one notable exception where a friend pocket-dialed me on their own raucous Saturday night after I had gone to bed. The call went to my voice-mail, where a ten-minute transcript was recorded of them hitting on someone at the bar. But other than that, the most interesting thing I’ve been privy to is learning that my husband’s workplace is nothing like the one on Mad Men. He has unwittingly proven on endless occasions that his interactions with coworkers point to nothing that would upset a wife.

I’m making it sound as if I spend all my time eavesdropping on everyone unlucky enough to have me in his or her cell-phone.  I don’t, partly because, contrary to the implications of your Facebook statuses, you guys never seem to be doing anything interesting anyway, but mostly because I wouldn’t like others to listen in on me just because my phone dialed them by mistake.

Sometimes, for fun, I shout something into the phone to see if the unwitting callers will be frightened by the disembodied voice emanating from their back pocket. It never works, so I just hang up – until my superpower visits again.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 782 other followers